Updated October 15, 2026

The 11 best Cursor alternativesin 2026, for developers and for people who don't code

Cursor is an AI code editor: you open your project and its agents change the files. Developers leave it for another agent or another way of paying; people who don't code leave it because it assumes they do. Here are the tools each group moves to, and what they cost.

By the Capacity team. Capacity is our product: it's listed first, and every section says who should pick something else. Prices come from each tool's official pricing page, checked on October 15, 2026.

Quick answer

If you're a developer, the closest alternatives are other coding agents: Claude Code and OpenAI Codex come with the Claude or ChatGPT plan you may already pay for, GitHub Copilot is $10 a month, Google Antigravity is free for individuals, Devin takes whole tasks and returns pull requests (its editor, Devin Desktop, is what Windsurf became), and Cline is open source.

If you're not a developer, you want an app builder, not an editor. Capacity, which we make, builds a working app with hosting from a description or straight from Claude or ChatGPT. Lovable and Bolt.new are the best-known prompt-to-app tools, Replit adds a code workspace you can grow into, and Base44 has the cheapest entry plan.

ToolBest forPaid plans fromFree planWatch out for
Capacitypeople who don't code and want a working app online, built from a description or from Claude or ChatGPT.$25/monthWeb app: no. Desktop: 1 projectNo free plan on the web; login via Clerk or Supabase
Lovable logoLovablea web app from a chat, with the code synced to GitHub.€25/monthYes, 5 credits a day (up to 30 a month)Builds web apps, not native ones
Bolt.new logoBolt.newbuilding in the browser with a free plan generous enough to try a real idea.$25/monthYes, 1M tokens a monthToken use grows with the project
Replit logoReplitpeople who want an AI agent, a real code workspace and hosting in one place.$20/monthNone listedHeavier Agent work billed by effort
Base44 logoBase44non-technical builders who want an all-in-one app with the backend handled.$16/month (yearly)Yes, 25 message credits a monthTwo kinds of credits to track
Claude Codedevelopers who'd rather run an agent in the terminal than in an editor.Claude Pro (€18/month)NoNo hosting; built for developers
OpenAI Codex logoOpenAI Codexdevelopers who already pay for ChatGPT and want an agent in the cloud, the terminal and the IDE.ChatGPT Plus (€23/month)Limited, on ChatGPT FreeLimits follow your ChatGPT plan
GitHub Copilot logoGitHub Copilotdevelopers whose code already lives on GitHub, at the lowest paid price here.$10/monthYes, 2,000 completions a monthAgent use draws on monthly credits
Google Antigravity logoGoogle Antigravitydevelopers who want several agents working in parallel, free to start.Free; more with Google AI ProYes, with weekly rate limitsLimits depend on your Google AI plan
Devin logoDevinteams handing whole tasks to an agent, and Windsurf users (its editor is now Devin Desktop).$20/monthYes, light quotaReturns pull requests, not a hosted app
Cline logoClinedevelopers who want an open-source agent and to pay only for the AI they use.Free + AI usageYes, open sourceYou pay for AI inference as you go

Why people look for a Cursor alternative. The reasons that come back most often.

The plans changed shape

Cursor's plans now pair AI usage pools with Grok models and features from X, from Plus at $8 to Ultra at $200 a month. Some developers would rather pay one model provider, or use a subscription they already have.

They want the agent outside the editor

Terminal agents like Claude Code and the Codex CLI, or cloud agents that return pull requests like Devin and Copilot's, fit people who'd rather review results than watch an editor.

They want open source or their own keys

Cline is open source and runs on your own API keys or at-cost inference, so the bill is exactly what the model provider charges.

They don't code

Cursor expects you to read the code and deploy the app yourself. People who want an app online without that look at app builders that write, host and publish it.

How we compared them. The same questions for every tool.

  • Who it's for: a developer working on a codebase, or someone who never wants to see code.
  • Where it runs: an editor, the terminal, the cloud, or a hosted builder.
  • How you pay: a subscription you already have, a plan with usage, or the AI you use.
  • Whether hosting, a database and a custom domain are included.
  • Where the code lives, and whether you can take it with you.

Easier, for people who don't code

01 · our product

Capacity

Best for people who don't code and want a working app online, built from a description or from Claude or ChatGPT.

Capacity's dashboard, where you describe what to build
The Capacity dashboard (sample projects)

Capacity turns a plain-language description into a working app: a React front end, a server and its own database, published at a capacity.studio address or on your own domain. You change it by chatting and watch each change in the preview. You choose the model (Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Fable 5.1, Mistral Large 4 or Kimi K3) or leave it on Auto.

Why pick Capacity over Cursor

  • A fixed monthly price: each plan comes with a set number of credits, and building from Claude, ChatGPT or Mistral is unlimited on every paid plan, because your own subscription writes the code while Capacity hosts the app.
  • Native mobile apps: Expo projects that you submit to TestFlight and Google Play from the publish dialog, with your own store accounts.
  • Hosting, a database and a custom domain are part of every paid plan, with a full version history to roll back any change.
  • Capacity Desktop ($249 once, macOS) runs the same builder on your Mac with your Claude Code or ChatGPT plan, and pushes the code to your own GitHub.

Watch out for

  • The web app has no free plan for building: paid plans start at $25 a month. Capacity Desktop has a free plan with one project.
  • Login isn't built in: you add it with the Clerk extension or a Supabase connection.
  • In the web app, your code downloads as a zip; pushing to your own GitHub is a Desktop feature.
  • It's not an editor: developers who want to drive every change in their own codebase will prefer Cursor or a coding agent.

Pricing

Starter $25/month (100 credits), Growth $69/month (250 credits), Professional $129/month (500 credits), Business $299/month (1,000 credits). Every plan includes unlimited projects, custom domains and unlimited building from Claude and ChatGPT.

Source: Capacity pricing page, October 15, 2026

Lovable logo

02

Lovable

Best for a web app from a chat, with the code synced to GitHub.

Lovable's home page
lovable.dev, October 15, 2026

Lovable builds web apps from a chat with a live preview beside it. Lovable Cloud adds the backend, with a database, user login, file storage and server functions on a Supabase foundation, and your code syncs both ways with GitHub on every plan.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • The tool most 2026 guides name first for non-technical founders building a web app.
  • The chat and the preview are the whole interface, and Lovable Cloud adds the database, login and storage.
  • Two-way GitHub sync on every plan, including Free, so a developer can take over later.

Watch out for

  • Each message uses credits, and Lovable Cloud usage is billed in credits too once its monthly grant is used.
  • For the App Store or Google Play, Lovable points you to a PWA or a Capacitor wrapper you set up yourself.

Pricing

Free: 5 build credits a day, up to 30 a month. Pro: €25/month for 100 monthly credits, with rollovers, top-ups and custom domains. Business: €50/month, adding a team workspace and SSO. Prices shown in euros from France.

Source: Lovable pricing page, October 15, 2026

Bolt.new logo

03

Bolt.new

Best for building in the browser with a free plan generous enough to try a real idea.

Bolt.new's home page
bolt.new, October 15, 2026

Bolt, from StackBlitz, builds websites and web apps from a chat in your browser and deploys them. Like Replit, the code sits right there if you want it; unlike Replit, the chat and the preview stay in front.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • One of the most generous free plans here: 300K tokens a day, 1M a month.
  • You can start from a prompt, a Figma file, a GitHub repository or a team template.
  • On Pro, unused tokens roll over to the next month.

Watch out for

  • Billing is in tokens, and long fix-and-retry sessions on a large project use them up faster.
  • Teams pay per member, $30 a month each.

Pricing

Free: 300K tokens a day, 1M a month. Pro: $25/month, no daily limit, from 10M tokens a month, unused tokens roll over. Teams: $30 per member per month.

Source: Bolt.new pricing page, October 15, 2026

Replit logo

04

Replit

Best for people who want an AI agent, a real code workspace and hosting in one place.

Replit's home page
replit.com, October 15, 2026

Replit Agent builds web and mobile apps from a chat, sets up the database and user login, tests its own work in a browser, and publishes the app with hosting, monitoring and custom domains. The code sits in a full cloud workspace you can open whenever you want.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • Everything from the first prompt to hosting lives in one product.
  • The Agent tests and fixes its own work in a browser while it builds.
  • Up to ten agents working in parallel on the Pro plan.

Watch out for

  • Plans include monthly credits ($20 on Core); beyond them, usage is billed by effort, so a long build is hard to price in advance.
  • The workspace shows the technical side, which can be a lot for non-technical founders.

Pricing

Core: $20/month ($18/month billed yearly), with up to 30 hours of chat on Free Mode and $20 of usage for the more powerful models. Pro: $100/month ($90/month billed yearly). Enterprise on request. No free plan is listed on the pricing page.

Source: Replit pricing page, October 15, 2026

Base44 logo

05

Base44

Best for non-technical builders who want an all-in-one app with the backend handled.

Base44's home page
base44.com, October 15, 2026

Base44, owned by Wix since 2025, builds the front end, backend, database, user login and payments from a plain-language description, runs the apps on its own infrastructure, and connects to tools like Gmail, Slack, Notion and HubSpot. It makes websites, internal tools, online stores and mobile apps.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • The lowest entry price for an app builder on this list: Starter is $16 a month billed yearly.
  • Login and payments are part of what it builds, not an add-on.
  • It wraps your app for the App Store and Google Play and helps you submit it.

Watch out for

  • Plans count two kinds of credits, message credits and integration credits, so check both before a busy month.
  • GitHub integration starts on the Builder plan ($40 a month billed yearly).
  • Store apps are your web app in a native web view, not a native rebuild.

Pricing

Free: 25 message credits a month. Billed yearly: Starter $16/month (100 message credits), Builder $40 (250), Pro $80 (500), Elite $160 (1,200). Monthly billing costs about 20% more.

Source: Base44 pricing page, October 15, 2026

Other coding agents, for developers

06

Claude Code

Best for developers who'd rather run an agent in the terminal than in an editor.

Claude Code's home page
claude.com/product/claude-code, October 15, 2026

Claude Code is Anthropic's coding agent. You give it a task, from a bug fix to a multi-day migration, and steer it from your terminal, your IDE, Slack or the web. It runs on macOS, Linux and Windows and comes with a Claude subscription.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • Included in Claude Pro and Max, so the price is a flat subscription rather than a meter per task.
  • Works on any codebase, with the code on your machine and in your repository.
  • If you'd rather not run it yourself, Capacity Desktop runs Claude Code for you on a Mac, and Capacity's web app builds from Claude.ai.

Watch out for

  • There's no hosting or database: you deploy and run the app yourself.
  • It's built for developers and expects you to review code.

Pricing

Included in Claude Pro: €18/month, or €15/month billed yearly (prices shown in Europe). Max from €90/month for 5x or 20x more usage.

Source: Claude Code pricing page, October 15, 2026

OpenAI Codex logo

07

OpenAI Codex

Best for developers who already pay for ChatGPT and want an agent in the cloud, the terminal and the IDE.

OpenAI Codex's home page
openai.com/codex, October 15, 2026

Codex is OpenAI's coding agent, included in ChatGPT plans. It runs in the ChatGPT app on macOS, on the web as Codex cloud, as an extension in your IDE and as a command-line tool, all tied to the same ChatGPT account.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • Included in ChatGPT Plus, Pro and Business, so you may already have it.
  • Cloud tasks keep running when you close your laptop, with a reusable environment for each repository.
  • It runs several agents in parallel and reviews pull requests automatically.

Watch out for

  • It works on a repository: there's no hosting or database, and you deploy the app yourself.
  • OpenAI sizes Plus for focused coding sessions each week; for full workdays it points to Pro, from €103 a month.

Pricing

Free: limited Codex access. Plus: €23/month. Pro: from €103/month, with three usage tiers. Business: €21 per user per month billed yearly, for 2 seats or more. Prices shown in euros from France.

Source: OpenAI Codex pricing page, October 15, 2026

GitHub Copilot logo

08

GitHub Copilot

Best for developers whose code already lives on GitHub, at the lowest paid price here.

GitHub Copilot's home page
github.com/features/copilot, October 15, 2026

GitHub Copilot started as autocomplete and is now a set of agents: a desktop app, Copilot in VS Code and other editors, a command-line tool, and a cloud agent with code review on GitHub. It works where your repository, issues and pull requests already are.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • Pro is $10 a month, the lowest paid plan on this list.
  • Pro can also run third-party agents, Claude Code and Codex, from Copilot.
  • Works in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Xcode, Neovim, Eclipse and Zed.

Watch out for

  • Chat, agent mode, code review, the cloud agent and the CLI all use GitHub AI Credits, so heavy agent work can need extra credits.
  • It's a developer tool: no hosting, no database, you ship the app yourself.

Pricing

Free: 2,000 completions a month, Copilot CLI. Pro: $10/month with the cloud agent, code review and $15 of monthly credits. Pro+: $39/month with premium models including Opus and $70 of credits. Max: $100/month with $200 of credits. Extra credits can be bought.

Source: GitHub Copilot pricing page, October 15, 2026

Google Antigravity logo

09

Google Antigravity

Best for developers who want several agents working in parallel, free to start.

Google Antigravity's home page
antigravity.google, October 15, 2026

Antigravity is Google's agent development platform: a desktop app to run several local agents in parallel, an agentic IDE with an agent manager, IDE extensions, a command-line tool and an SDK for building your own agents. It gives access to a variety of agent models, including Google's latest Gemini models.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • Free for individuals, with unlimited Tab completions and command requests.
  • The app runs several agents in parallel, organised by project, with scheduled messages for routine work.
  • One platform across an app, an IDE, extensions for other IDEs, a CLI and an SDK.

Watch out for

  • The free plan has basic weekly rate limits; higher limits come with Google AI Pro or Ultra.
  • It works on your code: hosting and a database are yours to set up.

Pricing

Individual: $0/month with basic weekly rate limits. Google AI Pro and Google AI Ultra raise the limits and add a flexible AI credit pool. Organisations: through Google Cloud, with Gemini Enterprise Standard and Plus plans from $30 per seat per month, or pay as you go.

Source: Google Antigravity pricing page, October 15, 2026

Devin logo

10

Devin

Best for teams handing whole tasks to an agent, and Windsurf users (its editor is now Devin Desktop).

Devin's home page
devin.ai, October 15, 2026

Devin calls itself an autonomous software engineer: it runs in the cloud or on your machine, tests its work in its own browser and keeps going until the pull request is ready to merge. Devin Desktop is the editor, with unlimited Tab completions; windsurf.com's pricing page now leads to it.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • Hands-off: you assign a task and review a pull request.
  • Pro includes Devin Cloud and frontier models from OpenAI, Claude, Gemini and SpaceXAI, plus open-source models.
  • Team plans add sharing and collaboration, centralized billing and an admin dashboard, for up to 200 users.

Watch out for

  • It works on a codebase and opens pull requests; it doesn't host a finished app for you.
  • Usage beyond your plan's quota is bought at API pricing.

Pricing

Free: a light agent quota and unlimited Tab completions. Pro: $20/month. Max: $200/month. Teams: $80/month plus $40 per full developer seat. Enterprise on request.

Source: Devin pricing page, October 15, 2026

Cline logo

11

Cline

Best for developers who want an open-source agent and to pay only for the AI they use.

Cline's home page
cline.bot, October 15, 2026

Cline is an open-source coding agent you use as a VS Code extension, in your terminal, as a desktop app or embedded in your own product through its SDK. You bring your own API keys from providers like Anthropic, OpenAI or Google, or buy inference through Cline at cost.

Why pick it over Cursor

  • Free and open source for individual developers, with no subscription or seat fee.
  • Works with many providers (Anthropic, Gemini, OpenAI, OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, DeepSeek and more), so you can switch whenever you like.
  • Runs where you work: VS Code, the terminal or a desktop app, with JetBrains on Enterprise.

Watch out for

  • Usage-based: what you pay is what the model provider charges for the work, so a heavy month costs more.
  • No hosting or database: you deploy the app yourself.

Pricing

Free for individual developers: you pay only for AI inference, with your own API keys or through Cline. Enterprise (SSO, JetBrains extension, centralised billing, team dashboard): custom pricing.

Source: Cline pricing page, October 15, 2026

Cursor and its alternatives, side by side. From each official site, October 15, 2026.

FeatureCursor logoCursorCapacityLovable logoLovableBolt.new logoBolt.newReplit logoReplitBase44 logoBase44Claude CodeOpenAI Codex logoOpenAI CodexGitHub Copilot logoGitHub CopilotGoogle Antigravity logoGoogle AntigravityDevin logoDevinCline logoCline
Paid plans from$8/month$25/month€25/month$25/month$20/month ($18 yearly)$16/month (yearly)€18/month (Claude Pro)€23/month (ChatGPT Plus)$10/monthGoogle AI Pro$20/monthFree + AI usage
Free planYes, limitedDesktop only (1 project)YesYesNone listedYesNoLimited accessYesYesYesYes (open source)
Where it runsIts own editor, plus cloud agentsHosted builder, or inside Claude and ChatGPTHosted builderIn the browserCloud workspaceHosted builderTerminal, IDE, Slack, webChatGPT app, web, IDE, CLIDesktop app, editors, CLI, GitHubApp, IDE, extensions, CLI, SDKCloud or your machine (Devin Desktop)VS Code, terminal, desktop app
How usage is billedAI usage pools, bundled with Grok and XMonthly credits; building from Claude or ChatGPT unlimitedMonthly creditsTokensPlan credits, then effort-based pay-as-you-goMessage and integration creditsYour Claude subscriptionYour ChatGPT plan's limitsMonthly GitHub AI CreditsWeekly rate limits by Google AI planPlan quota, extra at API pricingThe AI you use, at cost or with your keys
Hosting includedNoYes, custom domain on every paid planYesYesYes, metered deploymentsYesNoNoNoNoNoNo
Where the code livesYour own repositoryZip download; GitHub push from DesktopTwo-way GitHub syncIn Bolt; import from GitHubYour Replit workspaceGitHub from the Builder planYour own repositoryYour own repositoryYour GitHub repositoryYour own repositoryPull requests to your repositoryYour own repository

How to choose. Start from what you need, not from the ranking.

When to stay on Cursor

If you work in an editor, like reviewing diffs as the agent edits, and your plan's AI usage covers your month, Cursor remains one of the most complete AI editors, with cloud agents and automations on its higher plans and Teams from $30 per user.

Questions people ask. Short answers, with the details above.

What is the best alternative to Cursor?

For developers, Claude Code and OpenAI Codex are the closest: both are agents that work on your codebase and come with Claude or ChatGPT subscriptions. GitHub Copilot is the cheapest paid option at $10 a month, and Cline is open source. For people who don't code, an app builder like Capacity, Lovable or Bolt.new is easier than any editor.

What's an easier alternative to Cursor if I'm not a developer?

An app builder that keeps you in a chat and a preview and hosts the app for you: Capacity (which we make) builds from a description or from Claude or ChatGPT, Lovable syncs the code to GitHub, Bolt.new has a generous free plan, Base44 has the lowest entry price, and Replit lets you grow into the code.

Is there a free Cursor alternative?

Yes. Google Antigravity is free for individuals with weekly rate limits, Cline is free and open source (you pay the AI you use), GitHub Copilot Free includes 2,000 completions a month, and Devin has a free plan. Among app builders, Lovable, Bolt.new and Base44 have free plans.

Cursor vs Claude Code: which should I use?

Both work on a codebase you own. Cursor is an editor with agents built in, from $8 a month. Claude Code is Anthropic's agent for the terminal, IDE, Slack or web, included in Claude Pro and Max. Pick by where you like to work and which subscription you already have.

What happened to Windsurf?

Its editor now lives on as Devin Desktop: windsurf.com's pricing page leads to Devin's, where Devin Desktop has a free plan and a Pro plan at $20 a month.

Is GitHub Copilot a good Cursor alternative?

For code that lives on GitHub, yes: Copilot Pro is $10 a month with a cloud agent and code review, works in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Xcode and more, and can run Claude Code and Codex as third-party agents. Agent work draws on monthly GitHub AI Credits.

Can I build an app without code instead of using Cursor?

Yes. App builders write, host and publish the app from a description. Capacity also works from inside Claude or ChatGPT and builds native mobile apps; it needs a paid plan for building, from $25 a month.

Related comparisons

Try the alternative we build.

Describe your app in a sentence and Capacity builds it, or connect it to Claude or ChatGPT and build from the chat. Plans from $25 a month.